Sunday, February 19, 2017

Delusions Are Countless - Dharma talk

We don't need to uproot or annihilate our passions; rather, we must simply understand them. Seeing clearly reveals that our demons are really only shadows. No exorcism necessary.

Introduction and sound engineering by Tom Eunsahn Gartland.

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Why We Help - Dharma talk

When we assume that we our view is better than someone else's, we can easily fall prey to egoism and dogmatism. If we strive to "liberate" other beings, we can may begin to think that we know what is best for them. "Helping" others, on the other hand, means assisting people on their term and according to their needs.

Introduction and sound engineering by Tom Eunsahn Gartland.

Everywhere is the Center - Dharma talk

We often think that some beings matter more than others. Buddhism challenges this view by revealing that all beings are of the highest value and that no being is any more important than any other.

Introduction and sound engineering by Tom Eunsahn Gartland.

Sunday, February 5, 2017

Sarcasm and Right Speech

Over these past few weeks I have been trying to bite my tongue as much as possible when I get the urge to post a negative comment about some news update. After all, what good will adding my voice to the babel do?

Then the English teacher in me had a bright idea--sarcasm. The beauty of sarcasm is its indirectness; it bites like a mosquito when you're sleeping--from the side or under the covers. Sarcasm and irony have long been tools for political writers like Jonathon Swift, George Orwell, Joseph Heller, and modern political cartoonists. Saying one thing but meaning another is a powerful communication device that functions by insinuating the truth of its opposite.

For instance, if I say, "Boy, I'm so happy you insisted I come to this party; I just love being around drunk people!" Eye rolls for emphasis. The message is: I'd rather be somewhere else so please stop telling me what to do.  

Then I began wondering, how do irony and sarcasm fit into Buddhism's teachings about Right Speech? The Buddha said that we should consider three criteria before speaking:

1. Is it true?
2. Is it timely?
3. Is it helpful?

The last one resonates the most with me. Are we helping anyone when we post a political commentary? Fundamental to speaking correctly is our intention--for whom are we speaking?
Are we trying to help other people or are we just blowing off steam?
If our intention is for the benefit of others, then I think that sarcasm may be a very useful tool in exciting change in people's worldviews. Too much of anything can become excessive. (We all know someone whose every other sentence is sarcastic. This shtick gets old very fast, degenerating into negativity, not wit.). Yet sarcasm in small doses can challenge the status quo. The difference between satire and parody is enormous. The former seeks reform while the latter just mocks.

If the purpose of sarcasm or being ironic is change--to seek justice and equality--then I think that a moderate, skillful use of them may be very constructive.

Sunday, January 29, 2017

As a Brother and Sister - Dharma talk

The entire universe is one family. All beings are intimately connected--not just humans, but every plant, animal, insect, and atom. Compassion and wisdom mean treating all beings with the care, patience, and tenderness that we normally reserve for our closest loved ones.

Introduction and sound engineering by Tom Eunsahn Gartland.

Saturday, January 28, 2017

The Earth Is My Witness

The earth was not created; it most likely formed from the accumulation of interstellar dust in a process called planetary accretion. I raise this, not to undermine the notion of creationism, but to point out creationism's most dangerous logical conclusion--that the earth was created for humans.

This fundamental error, endorsed by some of the world's most influential religions, has been the root of many of our ecological and moral crises--pollution, animal cruelty and exploitation, the decimation of endangered species, fracking, deforestation, and so on.

I wish that this were a massive exaggeration, but the United States is currently facing one of the greatest threats to the environment that it has seen in decades (if not ever). The Trump administration seeks to deregulate the EPA and its related protective legislature to promote business expansion. If modern industry is left unchecked to do as it pleases, the result of this could be disastrous.

And at the heart of this lies that fundamental error--that the world was created for humans to do with as they please. Whether Trump and his administration genuinely believe such a fallacy is irrelevant because millions of people do, and not just his constituents. I would wager that even those Americans who don't identify as being religious subscribe to this destructive myth.

Stated directly:
Humans are not the owners of earth. This planet was not created for our entertainment, amusement, or consumption. And most importantly, humans are not the center of the universe.
Buddhism understands that humans are interconnected to everything else. While it is our habit to privilege humanity above other species or the planet as a whole, this tendency is not grounded in reality. Earth wasn't created for us; we are earth. We cannot exist without the soil, air, and food that grows. Humans--while an evolved species and a magnificent expression of life--do not live in a vacuum; inseparable from our environment, we are our environment. In the vast web of life, distinctions are arbitrary. There is no clear line demarcating where we begin and the earth ends.

We are an expression of that great unity called life, and as a conscious embodiment of it, we are responsible for how we treat the rest of the world. Because of developments in science and technology, humans have risen to become a dominant species on earth, but that does not make us the planet's rulers. Far from it, we are stewards at best.

We must learn to govern, live, and share this world responsibly. This begins with seeing clearly. I challenge--and encourage you to challenge--the destructive myth that animals were created for us to eat; that the earth was created as our playground. Nothing could be further from the truth, or more destructive.

Sunday, January 22, 2017

Styrofoam Cake: Perfect Symbol for Trump's Presidency

Donald Trump commissioned his inaugural cake to be identical to President Obama's cake from 2012. (See photo above: Obama's is on the left. Click here for the story.) While this may seem a bit strange, it's not what I find most fascinating about this bizarre story. As an English teacher deeply interested in literary symbolism, I was captivated by the fact that the cake was fake.
The cake is made of Styrofoam.
Only one portion of the cake--the part that is ceremoniously cut--is edible; the rest is a facade, just like our current president himself. More than a successful real estate mogul or casino owner, Trump is a brand. He has amassed much of his fortune based on his name, through licensing deals with golf courses and land development.

To paraphrase Shakespeare, what's in a brand? It is not land, natural resources, or gold. While extremely valuable, a brand is a formless phantasm. Like Trump himself, it lacks substance. Besides his mythical wall and a promised return to Reagan-era tax breaks for the wealthy, I can't identify any solid policy that Trump has proposed.

Because he hasn't proposed any. Trump got elected because of his ambiguity, not despite it. Like his shallow cake, he has no political platform other than a vague agenda to "make America great again," which is a campaign slogan, not legislation or policy.

Just as with so much of Trump, his Styrofoam cake is phony--a sugary veneer covering a sterile, unpalatable core.